Most attempts at restricting photography are done by lowerlevel security and law enforcement officials acting way beyond their authority. Furthermore, the prevalence of camera phones has resulted in the prevention of crimes and the apprehension of criminals.Īs the document states, there are not very many legal restrictions on what can be photographed when in public view. Restrictions on photography would not have prevented any of these acts. When people think back on the acts of domestic terrorism that have occurred over the last forty years, none have depended on or even involved photography. Photography has not contributed to a decline in public safety or economic vitality in the United States.

Photography in the United States has an established history of contributing to improvements in civil rights, curbing abusive child labor practices, and providing important information to crime investigators. Ironically, unrestricted photography by private citizens has played an integral role in protecting the freedom, security, and wellbeing of all Americans. For the most part, attempts to restrict photography are based on misguided fears about the supposed dangers that unrestricted photography presents to society. Examples have included photographing industrial plants, bridges, buildings, trains, and bus stations. Photographers are stopped, harassed, and even intimidated into handing over their personal property simply because they are taking photographs of subjects that make other people uncomfortable.

Kolor autopano video pro tutorial